It is plainly lewd or vulgar: Bethel School District v.Des Moines Independent Community School District, 393 U.S. The school expects the speech to substantially disrupt the educational process or setting: Tinker v.Schools may restrict a student’s speech if: Because dress may convey a message, the First Amendment comes into play in determining how far a school district can go in regulating what students wear. This can be especially true for high school students. Of course, a student’s dress can be a form of expression - a bold statement of one’s own persona or political views. More recently, proponents of school uniforms have argued that they improve student achievement and student test scores, although the research is mixed on both these claims and the claims of improved student discipline. Helping school officials recognize nonstudents who may be in the school.Helping parents and students resist peer pressure and.Preventing gang members from wearing gang colors and insignia at school.The focus then was on potential discipline and safety benefits, including: Department of Education urged the adoption of school uniforms as a strategy for reducing school violence. The push for school uniforms started in 1996, when the U.S. How is this possible in a climate where there is so much litigation and publicity regarding lawsuits about students’ rights to express themselves through dress - particularly T-shirts? These schools include, for example, 80% of Chicago public schools. Most of the schools adopting these policies have a high percentage of low-income students. In 2013, 23% of public elementary schools and 15% of public high schools required students to wear uniforms - up from 3% of all schools in 1996 (NCES, 2016). More and more public schools are adopting school uniform policies. Requiring school uniforms may be less legally fraught than implementing a school dress code.
0 kommentar(er)
